That door is this military action?

Turkey decided to take the shooting of military aircraft F-4 Phantom owned by Syria to the forum of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The move was taken based on the rights of Turkey in accordance with Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty signed in Washington DC, USA, 4 April 1949. In the article it is mentioned, all NATO members would discuss with the response to be taken if there was one member of the territorial integrity, political independence or security is threatened. Turkey is a key member of NATO since February 18, 1952. NATO will hold an emergency meeting at its headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, Tuesday (26/6), to determine an appropriate response to the incident. This meeting opened the possibility of NATO military intervention against Syria to stop the wave of violence that has killed more than 15,000 people since anti-government demonstrations broke out, in March 2011.fat loss Openly, several foreign ministers (ministers) NATO member states have rejected military intervention as an appropriate reaction to the shooting incident. "Military Intervention in Syria will not be discussed. It's not a matter of consideration of the Government of the Netherlands, but it's also been the attitude in the context of NATO, "said Dutch Foreign Minister Uri Rosenthal. However, that does not mean it's an opportunity to completely closed. Article 5 North Atlantic Treaty opens the possibility of joint military response if one member of an enemy attack. The article states, the armed attack against one member would be considered an attack against all NATO and joint military response is possible if deemed necessary. Military response Described in subsequent chapters, which can be categorized as an attack is a direct attack against the territory of the member or one of its military power, such as warships and combat aircraft, during the attack took place in the territory of the member or the international area in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic Ocean. In an interview with television station TRT Turkey, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu emphasized that Turkey's Phantom planes was shot in the international airspace within 24 miles of Syrian coastline. The plane was also unarmed reconnaissance aircraft as it is (type RF-4E Phantom II, reconnaissance variant of the F-4) and was shot without warning. Huseyin Bagci, a professor of international relations of the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, said, now the question whether the shooting of the plane's residence would be categorized as an attack on Turkey. "If it is interpreted as an attack on Turkey, the debate over the use of Article 5 will be raised," he told Agence France-Presse. If Section 5 is applied, a unilateral military strike against Syria could be done under the pretext of self-defense action. In the context of NATO, the military response that could be done without the mandate of the UN Security Council. Article 5 is only set, any military attack as it should be reported to the Security Council (UNSC) United Nations. During this time, several parties will expect NATO-style military intervention forced Libya to reduce Syria's President Bashar al-Assad. Some Arab countries even encourages military intervention was imminent. However, the move towards a more assertive action against Syria has prevented Russia and China. The two countries have twice vetoed UN Security Council draft resolution that includes the threat of sanctions against the Assad regime.